Premier League nears settlement with HMRC over 'Image Rights' payments
Thu 20th Jan 2011 | Money & Finance
The Premier League and U.K. authorities are moving closer to an agreement that will require clubs to pay millions of pounds to the government and curb teams’ attempts to reduce players’ tax bills, according to Bloomberg.
Players are thought to get much of their salaries for so-called “image rights” from the use of videos and photographs in advertisements and merchandise sales. Those payments are made to players’ companies, allowing them to escape the 50 percent tax rate for high earners, and sometimes to pay nothing. Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) argues that most players aren’t well-known enough to benefit from image rights.
According to sources, the amount owed to the government will be based on clubs’ revenue, with the highest-grossing teams such as Manchester United and Chelsea repaying a lower percentage of the taxes owed because the teams are better known globally.
“HMRC are well aware of attempts to use image rights as well as other schemes to avoid the 50 percent rate of tax,” the agency said yesterday in a statement.
“The taxation of image rights is a complex area where the tax treatment will very much depend on the facts of the particular case.”
The Sunday Times revealed how HMRC is negotiating the payment of £100 million from Premier League teams in back taxes. It’s understood that Arsenal has already come to an agreement with tax officials.
Premier League spokesman Nick Noble declined to comment on when negotiations started on the proposals, which will require clubs to repay six year’s worth of backdated tax.
United, Liverpool and Arsenal have benefited from their global reach to sign multimillion pound commercial agreements, and their players would be justified in having a larger proportion of their income paid as image rights, the people said.
“What it does is draw a line in the sand,” said Philip Long, a partner and soccer finance expert at accounting firm PKF. “It’s a pragmatic and commercial solution to what has been a running sore.”
The agreement follows the collapse of talks between the league and tax officials over a separate formula, which would have used a system that rated players by their marketability. Those with the highest rating would have been entitled to receive the most money for their image.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE F.C. BUSINESS RSS FEED
If you have any football business related news stories you’d like to share then please contact us – agourley@fcbusiness.co.uk or ryan@fcbusiness.co.uk
Related Articles
Manchester City 'best value for money' for fans
Tue 22nd May 2012 | Money & Finance
Manchester City have won the Premier League title and are also top of the league of value for fans, according to the ING Direct Value table. The bank chart compares club season ticket costs with...
Manchester United remain world's most valuable football brand
Tue 22nd May 2012 | Money & Finance
Manchester United remain the world’s most valuable football brand with a value of €672.9 million (£543m), despite ending the 2011-12 campaign without a trophy. The Brand Finance...
Gold welcomes financial benefits
Mon 21st May 2012 | Money & Finance
David Gold admits West Ham would have been in big financial trouble had they failed to make an immediate return to the Premier League. Gold reckons that Ricardo Vaz Te's goal three minutes from time...
Liverpool Count Cost Of Stadium Ambitions
Thu 3rd May 2012 | Money & Finance
Liverpool’s latest accounts show the true extent of Hicks and Gillett’s troubled tenure with over £35m wasted on the failed Stanley Park project. In an interview on the club’s...











Google
Live
del.icio
Digg



